Millions of Christians say God told them to take a job, leave a marriage, or start a ministry. Millions of others say that kind of talk is at best self-delusion and at worst dangerous. The Bible is complete — so is God still whispering, or have we confused our own desires for a divine voice? Pick your side and defend it.
Join the debate to comment
Reading is free. Members pay to post — that's why it stays clean.
Add your commentHe told me to reconcile with my father. I hadn't spoken to that man in eleven years. It was the last thing on earth I wanted to do. So there's your answer.
God absolutely still speaks. He spoke to me in 2019 when I was sitting in my car outside a gas station about to make the worst decision of my life. Audible? No. But clear as anything I've ever heard. You want to tell me that was my own brain? Fine. But I know what changed my life that night and it wasn't self-help.
My old pastor used to say 'God told me' every time he wanted to shut down a conversation. God told him to buy a second building. God told him to restructure the board so nobody could question him. God told him the woman who accused him was lying. This is not a hypothetical risk. This is what happens when you can claim private revelation and nobody's allowed to dispute it.
My grandmother heard from God. She was not educated, she did not speak in tongues, she was not in a fancy Spirit-filled movement. She just prayed and sometimes she knew things she had no way of knowing. I watched it my whole childhood. I am not interested in a theology that has no room for my grandmother.
The real tragedy is that cessationism, whatever its merits theologically, has produced churches that are functionally deist. God exists, Jesus died and rose, the end. No expectation of His presence, no hunger for encounter, just moral instruction and potluck dinners. If that's what Christianity is, I understand completely why people leave.
here's my actual question for the cessationists: if God doesn't speak anymore, what exactly are you asking Him when you pray? are you just talking to yourself? because if prayer is a real two-way relationship then something has to go both directions. the moment you admit God can impress something on your spirit in prayer you've already left cessationism whether you admit it or not.
I want to push back gently on both camps here. The cessationist position doesn't say God is passive or uninvolved — it says He works through His Word and through providence. The continuationist position, when taken seriously, has to grapple with the enormous amount of claimed 'divine guidance' that turns out to be catastrophically wrong. Both sides have real costs. Pretending otherwise is just tribalism.
The real problem isn't whether God speaks — it's that we have no reliable mechanism for testing whether a claimed word is actually from God. The Bible gave us prophets who were stoned if they got it wrong. Today we give people book deals.
Can we acknowledge that both extremes are equally bad? The cessationist extreme produces dry, spiritless orthodoxy. The continuationist extreme produces manipulable, authoritarian movements where whoever claims the loudest word from God wins. The answer probably requires both rigorous theology AND genuine openness to the Spirit and most of us are too tribalized to hold both.
If God stopped speaking the moment John wrote Amen in Revelation, why does Paul in 1 Corinthians 14 tell the whole church to 'eagerly desire the gift of prophecy'? Was Paul writing instructions for a gift that was going to expire in 70 years? If cessationism is true Paul gave some really confusing advice.
That's actually the most useful comment in this whole thread. Most functional cessationists already believe in something like 'illumination' — the Spirit opening up the meaning of Scripture in a way that's personal and specific. They've just drawn a line at calling it prophecy. Whether that line is principled or just semantic is worth a serious conversation.
I'll be the skeptic here. I grew up being told God spoke to me constantly — through circumstances, through feelings, through coincidences. I spent 30 years living in an anxious fog trying to decode every event as a divine message. When I finally gave myself permission to make decisions based on wisdom and love rather than 'is this a sign,' I became a healthier, kinder, more grounded person. Draw your own conclusions.
I'm a Reformed cessationist and even I have to admit this: the cessationist position is almost entirely an inference from silence plus a theology of the completed canon. There is no verse that says 'the gifts will cease when the New Testament is finished.' The 1 Corinthians 13 argument about the 'perfect' coming is genuinely contested. We should hold this position with humility, not hammer people with it.
I love how confident people are about hermeneutical rules that themselves aren't explicitly stated in Scripture. 'Descriptive not prescriptive' is a guideline developed by interpreters, not a divine decree. When it's convenient we quote Acts all day. When it's not, suddenly it's 'just narrative.'
Humility is great but there are real people in real psych wards who followed the voice they were sure was God. I am not being hyperbolic. I have worked in crisis mental health. The 'God told me' framework has no internal error-correction. None.
The canon is closed. God has spoken through His Word, fully and finally. When people say 'God told me,' what they almost always mean is 'I had a feeling' or 'circumstances worked out.' We dress up our intuitions in divine language and it's honestly a little embarrassing at this point.
The 'just obey what you already have' crowd never seems to notice that the same Bible they're defending is full of people receiving direct guidance — Paul getting stopped from going into Bithynia, Peter on the rooftop, Ananias being told to visit Saul. Were those people being unbiblical?
Hebrews 1:1-2. 'In the past God spoke to our ancestors through the prophets at many times and in various ways, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son.' The shift is explicit in the text. We are not in the era of new prophetic words — we are in the era of the Son. Read your Bible people.
That's not a testimony against God speaking. That's a testimony against a specific anxious hermeneutic of every coincidence as a cosmic message. Those are not the same thing and conflating them is doing real theological work here that you haven't earned.
If you genuinely believe God still speaks new, authoritative words to people today — words that carry divine weight — then explain why those words don't need to be tested with the same rigor as Scripture. And if they do need testing, and they can be wrong, in what sense are they actually from God? You can't have it both ways. Either the voice is authoritative or it isn't. If it isn't, stop calling it God's voice.
ok but why does every person who says god spoke to them end up doing something that benefits them personally. god told me to quit my job and pursue my passion. god told me this relationship is the one. god told me this business venture is blessed. when does god ever tell anyone to do the hard uncomfortable sacrificial thing they DONT want to do
God speaks through Scripture. Full stop. Everything He needs to tell you is already there. If you feel like He's saying something extra, that's what qualified pastors and elders and community discernment are for. We don't need more words — we need to actually obey the ones we have.
Amos 3:7 — 'Surely the Lord God does nothing without revealing his secret to his servants the prophets.' If that principle just... expired after the first century, you'd think someone would have written a book of the Bible explaining that. Instead we got the book of Revelation, which is itself a prophetic vision given to a first-century Christian. Make it make sense.
cessationism is a theology invented by people who never experienced anything. convenient doctrine for the guy who's never seen a miracle.
So because some people are mentally ill and experience religious delusions, God can't speak to anyone? That's the argument? By that logic we should throw out prayer entirely because some people treat prayer like a slot machine.
Acts is descriptive not prescriptive. You can't build doctrine from narrative. First day of hermeneutics class.
Should Christians pray to saints — or is asking Mary and the dead for help straight-up idolatry?
56 comments
Does God choose who gets saved, or do you choose God — and is Calvinism secretly making God into a monster?
55 comments
Is the prosperity gospel a damnable heresy — or just a badly taught truth that God really does want to bless His people?
54 comments
Is hell really eternal conscious torment forever, or does God eventually just snuff the wicked out of existence?
54 comments