Should Christians pray to saints — or is asking Mary and the dead for help straight-up idolatry?

• T

  Taylor1mo ago

  Yes. I lost my son to leukemia in 2019. During that time I prayed the rosary daily and there were moments of profound peace that I cannot explain naturally. I don't know if Mary interceded or if God met me through the practice regardless. But something was real. I will not apologize for that.

  194Reply
• S

  Sam1mo ago

  I grew up Catholic. Prayed the rosary every night with my grandmother. When I converted to evangelical Christianity at 24, my pastor told me I'd been committing idolatry my whole life. That absolutely wrecked me. I still don't fully know what I believe about it but I do know my grandmother wasn't worshipping Mary. She was asking a friend in heaven to pray for her. There's a real difference there that gets steamrolled in this debate.

  187Reply
• L

  Leo1mo ago

  Glorified saint in heaven. Right. And you know they can hear you HOW exactly? The Bible says God is omniscient. It never says the saints are. Why would Mary in heaven be able to simultaneously receive millions of petitions in dozens of languages at any given moment? That's not a saint. That's a goddess with a different name.

  167Reply
• S2

  Sam 211mo ago

  I'm a Protestant pastor and honestly the way some of my fellow Protestants talk about this makes me cringe. Calling Catholics idolaters is — I'm sorry — arrogant and historically illiterate. Do I practice it myself? No. Do I think it's biblically necessary? No. Is it idolatry? I seriously doubt it. Most Catholics I know love Jesus deeply. Lets be a little more careful with that word.

  155Reply
• P

  Priya1mo ago

  The canon of Scripture was itself defined by the very Catholic church you think went off the rails. You're trusting the council decisions of those 'extra-biblical innovators' for the book you use to critique them. That's a circle worth thinking about.

  149Reply
• M

  Maya1mo ago

  I am a convert to Catholicism and I want to say something honest: before I became Catholic, I was terrified of praying to saints because it felt spiritually dangerous and weird. After years of actually studying the theology — not the caricature — I find it beautiful. The communion of saints is the idea that death does not sever our belonging to one another in Christ. When I ask Mary to pray for me, I'm affirming that the Church is bigger than what I can see.

  143Reply
• R

  Reese1mo ago

  The prohibition on 'consulting the dead' is about necromancy — summoning spirits for divination. It has nothing to do with asking a glorified saint in heaven to intercede. Catholics aren't trying to summon Mary. They're asking her to pray. The category error here is enormous.

  143Reply
• Y_

  Yuki _x1mo ago

  1 Timothy 2:5. Done. One mediator. Not Mary, not Peter, not anybody else. I don't understand why this is even debatable.

  134Reply
• OS

  Omar S.1mo ago

  We absolutely can and do build doctrines on figurative language elsewhere in Revelation when it suits us (see: every single dispensationalist prophecy chart ever made). You can't say symbolic when it's inconvenient and literal when it supports your view.

  121Reply
• S2

  Sam 211mo ago

  Also the transfiguration. Moses and Elijah show up and have a conversation with Jesus. These are dead men. Apparently 'dead' does not mean what we assume it means beyond the veil.

  118Reply
• E

  Elena1mo ago

  comparing a grieving mother's prayer to Balaam's donkey is a choice my friend

  113Reply
• L

  Liam1mo ago

  The 'one mediator' verse is about Christ being the unique mediator of the New Covenant — the one who atoned for sin. It is NOT a prohibition on asking other believers to pray on your behalf. If it was, Paul asking churches to pray for him would also be 'idolatry.' The logic doesn't hold.

  112Reply
• DR

  Diego R.1mo ago

  so what's your exegesis of Revelation 5:8 where the elders in heaven offer up the prayers of the saints before the throne? Sounds a lot like intercessory activity from heavenly beings to me. or do we just skip that one

  109Reply
• C

  Casey1mo ago

  The historical record is clear: prayers to saints appear in Christian literature by the 3rd century at the very latest — long before any alleged corruption of the faith by medieval power structures. The Catacomb inscriptions include petitions to martyrs. This was the early church. If you want to recover 'biblical Christianity' you may need to reckon with the fact that the earliest Christians apparently did this.

  107Reply
• C

  Casey1mo ago

  I've been Orthodox for six years, came from Southern Baptist. The thing people miss is that in Orthodox theology, the saints are not dead — they are MORE alive than we are. They have passed through death into the fullness of life in Christ. Asking them to pray is not necromancy any more than asking your friend who moved overseas to pray for you.

  102Reply
• A

  Avery1mo ago

  The Eastern Orthodox tradition predates the Protestant Reformation by a thousand years and has maintained intercessory prayer to the saints throughout. If the Reformers were right and this was idolatry, then the Church was in total apostasy for over a millennium before Luther showed up to save everybody. I find that very difficult to believe.

  98Reply
• F

  Feli1mo ago

  The method assumes Scripture is self-interpreting and that the individual reader is the final authority. Which is itself a theological claim that can't be derived from Scripture alone. We're going in circles again.

  97Reply
• L

  Leo1mo ago

  Revelation 5:8 is fascinating and I've never seen a satisfying Protestant answer to it. The elders are presented as actively mediating prayers. That's in the canon. Can't just wave it away.

  97Reply
• S2

  Sam 211mo ago

  The distinction is that the saints are not divine beings — they're human beings united to God through Christ. Pagans worshipped beings they believed were themselves divine or semi-divine sources of power. Catholics aren't worshipping Mary as a goddess; they're asking a fellow human being who is alive in Christ to pray. The ontological category is completely different.

  96Reply
• T

  Taylor1mo ago

  The 'more alive than we are' line sounds great until you try to find it in Scripture. Where exactly does the Bible say the departed saints are conscious, aware, and capable of receiving and processing billions of simultaneous prayer requests? I want chapter and verse not a theological concept.

  91Reply
• J

  Jamie1mo ago

  That is actually one of the strongest arguments I've seen against it and I say that as someone who prays the rosary. I don't have a clean answer for the omniscience problem. I hold it in tension.

  89Reply
• R

  Ravi1mo ago

  So every distinctive Catholic/Orthodox practice is an error and every distinctive Protestant practice is correct? That's an awfully convenient hermeneutic.

  88Reply
• K

  Kofi1mo ago

  Hard agree with the pastor here. The word 'idolatry' is the nuclear option and we throw it around like a nerf gun. Idolatry is substituting something else FOR God. Asking a saint to pray for you, even if you think it's theologically unnecessary, is not the same as replacing God.

  88Reply
• O_

  Omar _x1mo ago

  The transfiguration is a unique miraculous event initiated by God. It doesn't license humans to initiate communication with the departed on their own terms. There's a huge difference between God revealing Moses and you trying to contact Moses.

  86Reply
• D

  Drew1mo ago

  My issue has always been practical rather than theological. Even if praying to saints is theoretically defensible, it functionally displaces prayer to God in so many people's experience. I've talked to Catholics who prayed to St. Anthony for lost keys and couldn't tell you the last time they just sat quietly and talked to the Father. That's a pastoral problem even if it isn't strictly heresy.

  84Reply
• F

  Feli1mo ago

  If you disagree that praying to saints is idolatry, you owe me an explanation for why it's categorically different from what the pagans in Acts 17 were doing when they directed petitions to divine beings who weren't God. I'm not saying it to be mean — I genuinely want the theological distinction clearly drawn because I've never heard one that fully satisfied me.

  84Reply
• R

  Reese1mo ago

  I'm so sorry for your loss. And I would never tell you that God didn't meet you there. I just think it was God who met you, not Mary — and the practice may have been the vessel God used despite being theologically off-target. Which is actually how I think about a lot of sincere but mistaken religious practice.

  83Reply
• NL

  Nina L.1mo ago

  Luke 20:38. 'He is not the God of the dead, but of the living, for to him all are alive.' Jesus said it about Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. They are alive TO GOD. Does alive to God mean conscious and communicative? That's the hermeneutical question.

  79Reply
• A

  Alex1mo ago

  ok but asking paul who is ALIVE to pray for you is categorically different from asking someone who is DEAD. the bible literally forbids consulting the dead. saul got in serious trouble for that remember?

  78Reply
• J

  Jamie1mo ago

  That's a very gracious way of saying you think grieving parents are accidentally doing paganism and God is just working around it. I appreciate the gentleness but that's the logic.

  77Reply
• Q

  Quinn1mo ago

  The Church being wrong for a long time is not a theological impossibility. It was wrong about geocentrism. It was wrong about slavery. Duration of error is not the same as correctness.

  76Reply
• L

  Liam1mo ago

  That's a fair pastoral concern. But the solution to a practice being misused isn't necessarily to condemn the practice entirely. People misuse direct prayer to God too — treating it like a vending machine, never listening. We don't abolish prayer.

  76Reply
• S

  Sam1mo ago

  That's actually the clearest answer I've gotten to that question in years. I still don't pray to saints but thank you for a straight answer.

  74Reply
• ET

  Elena T.1mo ago

  I hear you. For me it landed differently — the depth of disagreement among serious thinkers made me realize I needed an authority outside my own interpretation. That's part of why I'm Orthodox now.

  72Reply
• M

  Marco1mo ago

  If you're directing worship — even petitionary worship — toward anyone other than God, that IS idolatry by biblical definition. The line isn't just 'replacing God.' It's directing devotion that belongs to God alone toward a creature. Exodus 20. Full stop.

  71Reply
• R

  Riley1mo ago

  500 years and nobody has won. Maybe that should tell us something about the certainty everyone brings to this topic.

  71Reply
• RT

  Riley T.1mo ago

  Early = not automatically correct. The Galatian church was adding circumcision to the gospel about 20 years after the resurrection. Early Christians got things wrong. Paul told them so.

  69Reply
• Q

  Quinn1mo ago

  Okay that last comment got me. Fair point. We are inconsistent in how we handle Revelation depending on what conclusion we want.

  68Reply
• T

  Theo1mo ago

  With respect pastor, I think love for Jesus and doctrinal error are not mutually exclusive. You can love God sincerely and still be engaged in a practice He's forbidden. That's the whole point of correction in the church.

  67Reply
• M

  Marco1mo ago

  Doctrine matters because it shapes practice which shapes lives. This isn't just navel-gazing. Whether or not Christians are directing worship rightly is an enormously consequential question.

  63Reply
• A

  Avery1mo ago

  Honestly this is the debate that almost made me an agnostic. Not because I think Christianity is false but because smart, sincere, Bible-believing people have been unable to resolve this for centuries and I don't know what to do with that.

  61Reply
• SB

  Sam B.1mo ago

  or maybe mystery and tension are actually appropriate responses to the nature of glorified existence beyond death and we should be a little more humble about what we claim to know definitively about heaven

  61Reply
• D

  Diego1mo ago

  Beautiful sentiment. Genuinely. But beautiful does not equal biblical. Lots of things feel spiritually rich that are extra-biblical innovations.

  58Reply
• A

  Alex1mo ago

  For me that same realization landed me more firmly in sola scriptura because at least then I know what the authority is and I can read it myself. We end up in exactly opposite places from the same starting point. Wild.

  58Reply
• J

  Jamie1mo ago

  That's a theologically serious point and it's the best framing of the practice I've heard. I still don't do it but I can't just dismiss that.

  57Reply
• Y

  Yuki1mo ago

  Is it though? God worked through Balaam's donkey. Venue and means don't always determine legitimacy.

  55Reply
• K

  Kofi1mo ago

  Holding it 'in tension' is just a polite way of saying the theology doesn't work but you're too attached to the practice to let it go.

  54Reply
• RM

  Riley M.1mo ago

  It's a vision full of symbolic imagery. The elders aren't literal human beings praying YOUR specific prayers. This is apocalyptic literature. We can't build a doctrine of saint veneration on metaphorical incense bowls.

  53Reply
• A

  Avery1mo ago

  Real question for the Catholics and Orthodox in this thread: have you ever personally felt like you received a response or intervention that you attribute to a saint's intercession? Not asking to mock, genuinely curious about the experiential dimension of this.

  52Reply
• T

  Taylor1mo ago

  nah I disagree with that comparison. prayer to God goes directly to the right place by definition. prayer to a saint may or may not be received by anyone. those aren't equivalent risks.

  49Reply
• LL

  Leo L.1mo ago

  Ha. Fair. I walked right into that one. What I meant is that God has always worked through unexpected instruments. I just don't want to endorse a practice I believe is unscriptural while also acknowledging God's sovereignty and grace.

  49Reply
• O

  Omar1mo ago

  we've been in this loop for 500 years, haven't we

  44Reply
• J

  Jordan1mo ago

  Not every one. The question is which ones are supported by Scripture and which ones aren't. That's not convenient, it's just the method.

  43Reply
• A

  Alex1mo ago

  Or it tells us that one side is right and error is persistent. The longevity of a debate doesn't validate both positions equally.

  38Reply
• LT

  Leo T.1mo ago

  this whole thread is why I left organized religion tbh. you people spend so much energy arguing about WHO you're allowed to ask for prayer and zero energy on the actual problems in front of you.

  37Reply
• I

  Iris1mo ago

  Comparing doctrine to geocentrism is wild to me. Those are not equivalent categories lol

  33Reply

More debates people can't stop arguing about